Rector’s Sermon
October 24, 2004
21 Pentecost

 

Back to Sermons Directory

Return to Home Page

“Comparisons are odious,” it is said, but comparisons can also be revealing. The comparison the Pharisee makes with the Tax Collector is certainly odious, but Jesus’ comparison of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector is surely revealing..

The first comparison is one the Pharisee makes between his piety and moral uprightness to a tax collector who is also in the temple praying. The Pharisee is specific about his moral uprightness in comparison to that of thieves, rogues, and adulterers as well as to the tax collector who in his gouging practices we might be tempted to compare to the IRS from time to time.

The Pharisee is also specific in his piety, namely fasting twice a week and tithing. There is perhaps some irony in today being Stewardship Sunday (the Rector added parenthetically). To all outward appearances, the religiously fastidious Pharisee is offering a prayer of thanksgiving to God for preservation from sin and an account of his faithfulness. Also, to all outward appearances the tax collector was a legitimate object of scorn and abhorrence. He was a middleman for the Romans, and as such was considered unclean by the Jews and banned from their religious and social life.

But Jesus isn’t interested in outward appearances. He is interested in the human heart and soul. He is interested in motive. He is interested in honesty. And so while the Pharisee’s comparison would make absolute sense to the average observer, the comparison of Jesus reveals the mind of God who rejoices in the one sinner who repents over and against the 99 who need no repentance. For in the final analysis, the tax collector in his humility will be exalted and the Pharisee in his self-righteousness will be humbled.

There is some irony that on this Stewardship Sunday that a tithe—which is 10% of our income and a stretch for those not used to tithing—would appear to be not enough by Jesus’ standards, or at least not the only thing. It reminds me of the story about Stewardship Sunday at St. Paul’s Church, Darien, Connecticut, a charismatic evangelical Episcopal church that enjoyed tremendous growth and notoriety in the 1970s. That parish’s aspirations have been more modest in recent years, but it was a very exciting place back then and particularly so on Stewardship Sunday when the Rector announced that those who had not given their lives to Jesus should rip up their pledge cards because if they didn’t want Jesus fully in their lives, Jesus didn’t want their money. Calling it a dramatic moment could be an understatement, to say the least.

What the Rector was trying to say was that money cannot buy a relationship with God, but is rather one outward sign among many outward signs that we do live in relationship with God and that what we are doing today is fundamentally an act of thanksgiving.

Actually the Pharisee had it partly right when he began his prayer, “God, I thank you…” If the Pharisee had then gone on to pick up the tax collector’s piece of it by expressing his sorrow and his repentance, then he would have got it right. The spirit behind our giving is what Jesus wants us to cultivate—the condition of our hearts and our souls.

The Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion are struggling with issues of humility and exultation as the result of the election and consecration of a gay man living in a committed relationship, Gene Robinson, as the Bishop of New Hampshire. Last fall the Archbishop of Canterbury appointed a commission under the chairmanship of Dr. Robin Eames, Archbishop of Armagh, Anglican Primate of All Ireland, to consider ways in which communion and understanding throughout the Anglican Church worldwide could be enhanced where there are serious theological differences. In short, what is it about our Church we want to thank God for, and what is it about our Church we would express our sorrow? Also in short, how is it that our relationship with one another can mirror the relationship we have with God despite differences of opinion and ideologies that emerge from different cultural contexts?

The so-called “Windsor Report” is the result of the Commission’s work and can be read in its entirety on its own website, the address of which is in your bulletin. Bishop Persell’s press release in relation to the Report is also included in your bulletin, and I recommend it to you as well. The Windsor Report is an extraordinary historical document that I hope we’ll be able to discuss in some depth when the dust settles after the first of the year.

And so my hope for the Church and for the World, my hope for our nation and every house of worship in it, my hope for Christ Church and for you and for me is the hope expressed as that part of the Pharisee’s prayer when he got it right: “God, I thank you…,” and that part of the tax collector’s prayer which he assuredly got right: “God, be merciful to me, a sinner!”

As we thank God for the beauty of the Created Order, the inspiration of music and art and literature, the great benefit of science and technology when used to relieve suffering and promote the wellbeing of all, the love and the sacrifice of those who seek a better world—especially for those who are most at risk, for our opportunities to worship God and to give thanks for our families and our friends, for prayers of concern, for prayers for healing, for education, for play, for leisure, for work: “God, I thank you for these things.”

And yet we acknowledge and offer our sorrow that divisions in the world and in the Church are not what God intends for us, that hunger and racism and selfishness and violence bring joy to the Devil’s heart, that corporately and personally it is only when we can say, “I’m sorry,” that a climate of healing and peace can wash over us and cleanse us and bring us safely home. For you and I are that Pharisee and that Tax Collector as often as we can pray, “Thank you, God,” and “I’m sorry.”
Amen.