Rector’s Sermon
March 21, 2004
4 Lent

 

Back to Sermons Directory

Return to Home Page

Who are you in this story? Who am I, for that matter? The characters are a father and his two sons, although it could just as easily be any combination of father, mother, brothers, and sisters. The gender is not the point. The attitude is. This story which has been called the story of the Prodigal Son, along with the story of the Good Samaritan, both of which appear only in Luke's gospel, certainly rank as the most popular, and the best-known stories of Jesus. But Jesus' point has not just to do with the repentance of the Prodigal Son. It has equally to do with the love of his father and the resentment of his brother. And so I ask again: Who are we in that story, because there is room for all of us.

If any of you remember my Advent sermon when I talked about identifying with John the Baptist because of having played that role in a former parish's production of Godspell, let me just add that in the same production I also played the role of the resentful older brother in this story of the Prodigal Son. And just like it was a little scary how much I relished being able to point John the Baptist's finger at the congregation and called them, "You viper's brood," it's equally scary how much I could get into the part of the self-righteous, resentful older brother in the Prodigal Son. Truth be known, whatever part in that story you and I identify with there's always something of the older brother's attitude in most of us that rings true.

But let's get to the other two first.

Jesus intends for the father figure in this story to represent God. He is God because of God's unconditional love for us, a love with no strings attached. This story doesn't say that the father approved of what the younger son did, only that he welcomed him home and that the father's forgiveness was extended even before the younger son could publicly repent. Robert Frost once wrote, "Home is the place where, when you have to go there, they have to take you in…Something you somehow haven'to deserve."

But even though in the story the father is meant to represent God, you and I are meant to identify with the father and to ask ourselves to what extent the love we have for our children or our parents or our brothers and sisters or our friends is conditional on what it is we receive in return. That's a hard thing to do, this unconditional love business, especially if we have good cause to be angry, and maybe that's why in the parable it's God who is represented by the father. But Lent is a good time to think about one or two relationships that have disappointed us or troubled us, and how it is we might hold those relationships up to the light of God's forgiveness and God's open arms and God's compassion.

But then that leads us to the object of the father's unconditional love that was the Prodigal Son, the lost son, the profligate son. How do we identify with him beyond the obvious examples of those who screw up their lives so badly, ending up penniless and homeless and so destitute that the soup kitchen is their last hope of survival? I don't know about you, but I've never had a day in my life when I was hungry apart from my own desire to be hungry. I've never been so completely destitute that I've had to throw myself upon the mercy and charity of others to stay alive. And yet, don't we all have moments of selfishness, of irresponsibility, of ignoring conventional wisdom and at least fantasizing about what it might be like to live as if there were no tomorrow. And what does it mean to "come to your senses" in the realization that where you find yourself in life is not where you're meant to be, that you've wandered so far away from those values and circumstances you'd once held in such high esteem? Apart from the big, bad ones, how do we deal with the little indiscretions, the small lies, the little bit of cheating which then become habitual and take us to that "far country," in which the Prodigal Son found himself when he "came to his senses"? And how difficult is it for us once we've realized the truth to say we're sorry, to own the truth that when we hurt ourselves we hurt others, and when we hurt others, we hurt ourselves?

Which then leads us to the older brother who had none of those problems. Far from it! In fact, in every other circumstance we would commend his loyalty as a son, his hard work, his worthiness-in short, all of those things you and I have been taught are good things. In fact they are good things, but like all good things they become susceptible to our pride, and our righteousness creeps towards self-righteousness, and our sense of privilege becomes entrenched with the conviction that we deserve it. That's the exact scenario being played out in this story as the older brother seethes at the generosity of his father's heart toward the sibling who had betrayed his father but who had assuredly betrayed his older brother. What kinds of feelings are engendered in us when we think our parents have been unfair? What do we feel when a friend aces an exam we know they haven't studied for, and we barely get a C (if people get C's anymore) after working our tails off?

The point Jesus makes is that the older son in his resentment is just as lost as the younger son, but that the older son is just as loved as the younger son, and that all of us need that healing and forgiveness and reconciliation in real life as much as they are represented in the life of a story.

When we come up to the altar rail for Healing in a few minutes or in our prayers for healing, perhaps we should lift up not only physical need but also emotional and spiritual need by which we find ourselves estranged from others and therefore estranged from God. What is that far country in which we find ourselves, how is it that we are cut off from those places of safety and welcome? How might we experience the unconditional love of God for us by offering up those things that separate us from God and from others, or others from us?

In this sacrament of Healing God is saying, "Come home, come home."

Amen.